The puzzle is coming together faster than anyone thought. Modern science is catching up at a rapid pace with understanding ancient text and their collective directive. In short -- hold-on-tight (modern metaphor) or learn to let go and cautiously go-with-the-flow (metaphysical metaphor).

Scientific galactic discoveries are reaching a point of such a feverish pitch, there are some in the astro-physics community who believe a stop-gap measure should be implemented out of concern (I would say fear), of losing control of traditional scientific methods.

This scientific shift is so vast; I would compare it to a time when Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Paul Allen were working out of their garage producing a machine that would change the world forever. Of course, it was the start of something called the PC. It wasn't just the outcome of Macintosh, and Windows, but perhaps even more importantly was the offspring of Intel and AMD.

This will be a longer article than what you are use to, but I would suggest to savior every sentence of it. I believe this will be an outline (template) of the direction science is heading.

It will be no surprise to those who have been following ECM's research, to find the direction of current new galactic and geo-physical findings run smack-dab into Mayan Prophecy. What is now being discovered and embraced - is galactic events related to charged particles i.e. magnetic fields, plasma, and yes -- dark energy, black holes, ether - has a direct causal interplay with Earth's core.

What is the practice and principal of what is known as the 'Scientific Method' of research? I will present the 'long version' for my scientific colleagues, and this will be followed by a more brief 'summary' for those who have no practical need to understand the language.

Click to Here to Enlarge

Long Version:

The scientific method may be summarized as the following sequence of steps: Identification of a knowledge problem; precise formulation or reformulation of the problem; examination of the background knowledge in a search for items that might help solve the problem; choice or invention of a tentative hypothesis that looks promising; conceptual test of the hypothesis, that is, checking whether it is compatible with the bulk of the existing knowledge on the matter; drawing some testable consequences of the hypothesis; design of an empirical (observational or experimental) test of the hypothesis or a consequence of it; actual empirical test of the hypothesis, involving a search for both favorable and unfavorable evidence (examples and counterexamples); critical examination and statistical processing of the data (for example, calculation of average error and elimination of outlying data); evaluation of the hypothesis in the light of its compatibility with both the background knowledge and the fresh empirical evidence; if the test results are inconclusive, design and performance of new tests, possibly using different special methods; if the test results are conclusive, acceptance, modification, or rejection of the hypothesis; if the hypothesis is acceptable, checking whether its acceptance forces some change (enrichment or correction) in the background knowledge; identifying and tackling new problems raised by the confirmed hypothesis; and repetition of the test and reexamination of its possible impact on existing knowledge.

Short Version:

Scientific method is comprised mathematical and experimental techniques employed in the natural sciences. Many empirical sciences, especially the social sciences, use mathematical tools borrowed from probability theory and statistics, together with such outgrowths of these as decision theory, game theory, utility theory, and operations research. Philosophers of science have addressed general methodological problems, such as the nature of scientific explanation and the justification of induction. See also Mill's methods.

A consortium of astro-physicists, cosmologist, and astronomers have warned that, unless we use this current flood of new galactic research sparingly, we risk setting up a dangerous scenario. If the whole data set from the WISE and PLANCK mission is released at once, as is planned, any new ideas that cosmologists come up with may have to remain unresolved because they will have no frame of reference to measure against.

This is a problem unique to cosmology. In other sciences, additional information is always available: you can always reset and rerun an experiment, or go out into the field to collect more data. Because of our fixed location in the universe, however, cosmology doesn't have that luxury. There is only a finite amount of information we can gather about our galaxy and this segment of the universe. In this area of cosmic ray particles, we may never know the source of cyclical events beyond the Sun-Earth connection - and our rapid discoveries of the Galactic Core - Earth Solar System connection.